请阅读下列单段。
1)Not to be outdone, European automakers are cramming new features into their own wired cars.2) Daimler Chrysler has designed a system that can not only call for help or notify the nearest police station in an emergency but also provide hospitals with the driver’s medical details. 3)North American car makers are also struggling to harness Net. 4)They equip their cars with a Net link or On Star system, which keeps track of vehicle locations, automatically notifies authorities when airbags go off, and links to household electronic appliances which the driver may order to get everything ready before he/she gets home.
Study:
1)European automakers—Daimler Chrysler;
2)new features—a)call for help, b)notify police station, c)provide hospital with driver’s medical history;
3)North American car makers: harness net—a)keeps track of… b)notifies authorities… c)links to …
第二行中的DC很明显和第一行中的European automakers 构成了例证关系。因此第二句中的动词排列a)call for help, b)notify police station, c)provide hospital with driver’s medical history;就是对第一句中的new features的例证。第四行中的also表明North American car makers和上部分平行。和European automakers呢还是Daimler Chrysler？由于DC 的内涵小于European automakers，因此North American car makers和European automakers平行。因此，本段结构：句2支持句1，句4支持句3，1和2整体与3和4平行。
这种分析在开始时可形成习惯。它不会对你的理解速度构成阻碍，但对你的整体能力有极大帮助。尤其是段落长了之后，没有整体感你读不下去。
也许你会怀疑说，我要能这样分析的话，已经读懂了，那还有必要这么做吗？对这个问题，我的回答是：也许你单句很清楚，但上下句关系你不一定有意识，而且当单句难度明显加大之后，要借助上下句之间的关系，利用较简单的句帮助理解较复杂的句。没有整体意识，想要单独突破句子，一则句本身难度大，二则就算你读懂了句本身，你也不一定能弄清楚句关系，因此达不到对文章的理解。下面一段文字是我在天津北京沈阳福州为3000学生讲过的文章。你看看文章讲的是什么。所有生词都加汉语注解。供六级和考研学生阅读。
The old view of Galileo was delightfully uncomplicated. He was, above all, a man who experimented: who despised the prejudices and the book learning of the Aristotelians, who put his questions to nature instead of to the ancients, and who drew his conclusions fearlessly. He had been the first to turn a telescope to the sky, and he had seen there evidence enough to overthrow Aristotle and Ptolemy together. He was the man who climbed the Leaning Tower of Pisa and dropped various weights from the top, who rolled balls down inclined planes, and then generalized the results of his many experiments into the famous law of free fall.
But a closer study of the evidence, supported by a deeper sense of the period, and particularly by a new consciousness of the philosophical undercurrents（潜流） in the scientific revolution, has profoundly modified this view of Galileo. Today, although the old Galileo lives on in many popular writings, among historians of science a new and more sophisticated picture has emerged. At the same time our sympathy for Galileo’s opponents has grown somewhat. His telescopic observations are justly immortal; they aroused great interest at the time, they had important theoretical consequences, and they provided a striking demonstration of the potentialities hidden in instruments and apparatus.// But can we blame those who looked and
failed to see what Galileo saw, if we remember that to use a telescope at the limit of its power calls for long experience and intimate familiarity with one’s instrument? Was the philosopher who refused to look through Galileo’s telescope more culpable（有罪的） than those who alleged that the spiral nebulae（星云） observed with Lord Rosse’s great telescope in the eighteen-forties were scratches（刮擦留下的痕迹） left by the grinder（磨镜片的工人）? // We can perhaps forgive those who said the moons of Jupiter were produced by Galileo’s spy-glass（小望远镜） if we recall that in his day, as for centuries before, curved glass（曲面镜） was the popular contrivance for producing not truth but illusion, untruth; and if a single curved glass would distort nature, how much more would a pair of them?（399words）
这篇文章的第二段文字被同学们惊叹为天书，如果没有我所称的整体阅读意识，是很难在10 分钟内阅读并完成题目的。
那么，如何才能培养这种意识呢？方法很简单：挑选10个长度在5行以上的阅读材料（16开），参照我的上文示范，多加体会，自然会有收益。
